How to make drastic improvements to your drumming in 2 hours!

These are the kind of headlines people use for blogs all over the internet. Remember the days when you had to go out to a record shop if you wanted to buy a new album? Maybe the shop didn’t have it so you’d have to order it and wait a week. Now you can buy it on iTunes almost instantaneously, or just find it on youtube. If you want a physical CD you can order it on Amazon and have it in your hands the next morning.

We’ve come to expect instant delivery of what we want, and subconsciously it feels like it should also apply to the acquisition of skill. Unfortunately it just doesn’t work like that. Acquiring a skill takes as much time and requires the same amount of work as it used to. If there were instantaneous ways of acquiring them then we’d no longer call them skills.

Back in 2001 I saw David Blaine on TV for the first time. He was biting chunks out of coins, waving his hands over things to make them disappear, and levitating. I’d always had a soft spot for magic and I really wanted to believe this stuff. The reactions of the people around him certainly suggested that it was real. Same thing with Uri Geller bending spoons and stopping watches. As much as I wanted to believe it I was well aware that ‘if’ somebody figured out how to levitate I would be watching it on the news rather than a prime time entertainment slot.

In the same way, I’m sure if somebody really did figure out a way that you could acquire a skill in next to no-time, a bona fidé short cut, then that would also be newsworthy. Hence, I’m fairly confident that not much has changed as far as the human ability to acquire new skills.

On the other hand the arrival of the internet and youtube HAS given us instant access to information. Almost all the information you could possibly want about anything is just waiting for you to enter the right search terms. Combine that with a lot of time practicing and the results are extremely impressive.

The downsides of this are that it can be off-putting to see just how many amazing players there are out there and just how much stuff there is to learn. If one person has spent a lifetime working on one style, and another has spent a lifetime working on another style, you’re not going to be able to be that good at both of them (unless you live twice as long!)

Despite there being no genuine shortcuts there are certainly better routes. You might be trying to tunnel your way out through a 5 foot brick wall with a spoon when you see a youtube video that shows you how to use a hammer and chisel, or even points out that there’s nothing on the other side of the wall.

A good teacher watching you playing can point out things that might take you years to discover for yourself. It’s hard to put this information into a video or a book as everybody is struggling with their own problems and it’s not always easy to identify what they are.

My personal approach to my own development is to seek out things that I think ought to be simple, but that I struggle to play. You’d be surprised how many of these there are! I figure that improvements in these areas will pay off in multiple ways. Not only are they the building blocks of more complex activities, but the fact that they’re simple and you set yourself simple goals means that you can witness the improvement and that encourages you to continue.

I try to make my youtube lessons as informative as possible, but there’s a limit to what you can fit into 10 minutes or so. The MasterClass lessons are where I go into details about all the subtleties that I’ve discovered over the years. More often than not it’s these little insights that click with people and get them over a hump. I try to share not only the exercises that I do, but also why I do them and where they come from. That way you can develop your own approach to improving your playing, and that is what’s going to make the difference.

I’m currently working on a new series of MasterClass lessons which will really break these concepts down. If you don’t already have an account be sure to sign up to be notified when they go live.

The Kelly Shu kick mic mounting system

If you usually mic the kick drum through a hole in the head with a short mic stand maybe you’ve experienced some of the same problems I have…

- the singer kicks the stand and knocks it out of place
- it’s a shitty stand that keeps drooping
- the mic suddenly swivels round in the middle of the gig
- the vibrations from the stage get picked up by the mic
- the venue doesn’t have an appropriate stand

Out of all the things that could go wrong in a gig, these were the most common problems.  All of them related to micing the bloody bass drum.

I’d considered the May micing system before but I didn’t like the idea of drilling my bass drum shell and it all looked a bit convoluted to me.  So I was overjoyed when a friend recommended the Kelly Shu.  As far as I’m concerned it’s the ideal solution to this problem.  I’ve used it for the last two tours with Wishbone Ash and it has saved time and space as well as providing the exact same kick sound to the engineer every night.

I was in the process of installing new loops into my studio kit and I thought I’d give it a bit of a plug as I would never have heard of it if it wasn’t through word of mouth.

Check out the video to see what a neat solution this is…

If you want to buy one, I opted for the pro version and bought it on Amazon.

Since I only have one Shure Beta52 and there’s a hole in my bass drum head I decided to buy an off cut of leather and make extra loops.  I’m installing them on my studio kit and the US touring kit.  I’ll just move the Shu and mic between them :)

 

How should you set up your kit?

I get asked a lot about where’s the best place to put your drums and your cymbals.  I think the assumption is that I feel comfortable behind my kit – which is actually rarely the case.

Over the configuration of my kit has changed again and again.  I’m fairly traditional in that my set up is usually pretty basic.  I’ve done the thing of copying set ups in drum catalogs and magazines.  I’ve had my ride cymbal almost vertical and in my face like my favourite drummers did in the 90s.  I’ve had my toms high, had them low, had them angled had them flat.

When playing a 2 hour show night after night I’ve found a few things to be important to me. The ideal situation is that after a month on the road I’m not walking around like a hunchback with one hugely built up shoulder.  There are a lot of songs in the set I play that involve a lot of playing on the ride bell.  My ride cymbal is 22″ so having the bell reachable means there’s 11″ of cymbal coming towards me.  This always seems to end up in a fight for space between the ride and the 2nd rack tom.

The 2nd rack tom is my other nemesis.  I’ve always found it to be an awkward drum to reach with my left hand.  I’ve checked out bird’s eye views of Vinnie’s kit and he always seems to set his rack toms squarely on the kick drum, but for me that makes it hard to reach and pushes my ride too far away for comfort.

On some previous tours I tried mounting the 10″ tom on my crash cymbal stand so I could move the 12″ further to my left.  That allowed me to bring the ride cymbal in closer and was a good solution, but for some reason I stopped doing it.

It allows me to have the 12″ tom almost central above the kick drum, but I found that it wasn’t always easy to get it exactly where I wanted since that mount isn’t really designed to hold a drum in that position.

 

On this tour I started out with the regular configuration, but my preference is always to turn the rack tom mount so the toms look as close to the above as possible.  That is, I’ll have the 12″ as close to the middle as I can and the 10″ extended out further.

I seemed to be having a problem with the resonance of the 12″ tom when I did this.  It sounded fine when I was holding it, but once I’d mounted it on the holder it became very choked.  I couldn’t figure out if it was to do with the holder, or the fact that its bottom head was in very close proximity to the kick drum and it didn’t have space to ‘breathe’.  The 10″ on the other hand had lots of space underneath and was very resonant.

I tried switching the positions of the two toms and it helped a little.  I also thought it might be fun to try out this new arrangement.

Weirdly, it made my 10″ tom look like an 8″ and my 12″ tom look like a 14″.  I guess it’s because I’m so used to seeing them the other way around.

I’d actually considered doing this before for other reasons.  10″ toms aren’t really suited to Wishbone Ash music.  I particularly like it for certain fills and I want to have it there, but the 12″, 14″,16″ are the most appropriate drums to use for fills.  The trouble is that the 12″ was always the most difficult to get to.  Setting up this way meant that it was more easily accessible and I could treat it as my main rack tom.

Also, the 10″ is a shallower drum.  Since the 12″ is now to the side of the kick drum I can actually lower the toms more without the kick getting in the way.  Since the 10″ is also narrower it’s easier to bring the ride in closer.  All good results!  It also made for some interesting fills and made me think more about what I actually wanted to hear.

Whether or not I’ll still set up like this on future tours – who knows.  The point is that there isn’t a “right way”.  If you’re uncomfortable with something, then try changing it.

I always wanted to see what it felt like to sit behind Dave Weckl’s kit, or Vinnie’s kit.  The thing is, they’re not me.  A 1/2 inch difference in height or reach makes a big difference in how things feel.  Plus, if you check out their set-ups over the years they’ve also changed drastically.  I haven’t asked them, but I bet they suffer from the same issues as the rest of us.

Jeff Porcaro fill from Toto’s “How Many Times” (4:05)

Here’s a Jeff Porcaro fill transcribed by request…

Jeff Porcaro Fill

Half tempo version

 

If you enjoy this content please spread the word, subscribe, check out my MasterClass lessons and software, Like my Facebook page, etc.

How do we feel time?

Check out this video and see if you fare any better than I did… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg8a0J6Wiks

I find it extremely difficult to stay in time if I’m not moving any part of my body or singing/counting out loud.  Once time is relegated purely to a mental state it seems almost completely elusive.

I find myself analysing and questioning my precision while trying to keep time.  Once the click has stopped I have to imagine the clicks filling in the space I notice my inner voice asking “did I just imagine that click too quickly? Or too slowly?”

The same thing happens when I’m playing drums on a gig and trying to really hold down the time.  I can only imagine that those thoughts get in the way of actually keeping good time.

What I need is confidence that I can keep good time without having to keep asking myself and questioning it.  In order to gain this confidence I need to successfully stay in time (working with these time check exercises) more often than not.  In order to test whether I can stay in time when I’m not analysing, I need to believe that I can keep good time.

But I still feel like I need a method.  Let’s say the click stops for a bar and I just guess where it comes back in.  I clap where I think it’s going to start again and I absolutely nail it. It happens again and again.  Could I have confidence without having a method?  It’s like being able to accurately guess the number of peas in a jar at a fete and always getting it right, but not knowing how you can do it.

For now I’m testing different approaches.  For example, I might count at a 1/16th rate (mentally), or at an 1/8th note rate, or a 1/4 note rate.  Or I might just imagine a rhythm in one of those rates.  Or I might imagine a bass line for a song.  I’m testing each of these to see which seems to be most effective.

Let’s say I want to be scientific about it I might try each method 10s of times on different days and note how well each seems to work.

The really strange thing is it’s not even that easy to know what you’re doing.  Say you’re imagining counting, but suddenly you question whether you just counted the number 7 or not.  Then you have to answer that question before you know which number to imagine next, perhaps feeling like you have to back track because by this time another 2 imaginary pulses have passed.

The mental world is all very strange.

If you have any success with this post a comment and let me know…

Jost Nickel Montreal Solo – transcription of cool reggae bits…

In the last week two different people have turned me on to Jost Nickel.

Here’s a transcription of some cool bits he plays in this solo

They happen at 1:50 – 2:20, and 3:25 – 3:50

Jost Nickel 1,50 – 2,20

Jost Nickel 3,35 – 3,50

Enjoy!

Joe

Vinnie Colaiuta lick in Chaka Khan soundcheck clip

Ok, I can’t post the video to this, but if you’ve seen the video of Vinnie messing around in a Chaka Khan soundcheck this is one of the licks he plays (at the 2:28 mark).

It sounds a bit like a songo groove if you start it in a different place.  I’m not sure where he was feeling the 1.

On beat 4 he plays the &a with the left hand.  After that he goes back down the toms just repeating the same pattern used for beats 1 and 2.

Lessons from the road…

I’ve been recording every gig on this tour and listening to the recording on the journey to the next gig.

I always find that when I’m disciplined enough to do this regularly I learn a lot about how I can improve my playing.  While you’re actually playing the gig there are so many things to think about and it’s very difficult to know if how it feels or sounds in your head is how it feels and sounds to the audience.  Recording the gig is a great way to know…

I want to talk about three particular lessons I’ve learned in the last two weeks… These relate to tuning, over playing, and confidence.

Tuning

The thing that stood out in the recordings from my first few gigs was how loud the snare drum seemed in comparison to everything else.
I hit the drums pretty hard and I figured perhaps I needed to lay off a bit on the snare drum, or maybe not play rim shots for all the back beats.

It just so happened that the support band’s drummer had a great sounding snare drum and I’m always interested to see how different drummers tune their drums and what they use.  When I went to check out the tuning I realised he was using the exact same model that I use – the Pearl Ian Paice signature snare (it’s a knock off of the Ludwig Supraphonic that was used on so many 70s records)

We compared the tuning of our snares and his was only a tone or so lower pitched than mine. I only had time to quickly drop the tuning of my batter head to match his before people started coming in.  The drum felt a little less responsive (that’s probably the reason I usually opt for a slightly higher tuning) but I figured I’d leave it and see how it felt on the gig.

2 hours later I was on stage and my snare felt great to play and sounded fantastic in my in ear monitors.  Listening back to the gig recording the next day I no longer had a problem with the snare sticking out, and the sound was much more consistent.  It appears that tuning the drum slightly lower not only makes it sit better within the kit, but also makes it much easier to have consistent sounding rim shots.  In short, I was very happy with the results.  The last few gigs have been a real pleasure to play, largely as a result of this new snare sound.

After the gig our sound engineer asked me what I’d done to my snare because it sounded amazing. He has two theories about rock bands…

1. If the drummer is good, the band will sound good.
2. If the snare sound is good, the kit will sound good.

In my previous blog post I uploaded a recording of the tuning.  I’ve dropped it a little lower since then (to approximately an ‘A’) and it sounds even better.  On another note I also have the snares pretty loose so they don’t choke the drum, and I’m using a coated Emperor on the batter head.  I always used to use coated Ambassadors until I heard that John Bonham used an Emperor.  However, the support band’s drummer is using an Ambassador and his snare still sounds great (perhaps still even a little better than mine!)

Over Playing

Another thing I noticed when listening back to the first few gigs was that I played a lot of fills and had little habits in certain grooves that just weren’t cool.  I’d either loose the groove slightly, or what I was playing just didn’t sound good.  I decided to go back to basics and play as simply as I could.  It was much more satisfying to listen back to a gig where the time was great and every note was intended.  Everything just grooved better and sounded more solid.  When I wasn’t playing unnecessarily complicated things I could focus on what was important and the music definitely benefitted from that.

After a few gigs of playing this way I’d start to add certain things back in, but they’d be more considered and intentional.  I made mental notes of the habitual things I did that I didn’t like the sound of and eliminated them from my playing altogether.  It’s a bit like catching yourself adding unnecessary words into sentences (“like”, “er”, “you know what I mean”, etc.)  Once you’ve become aware that you do it you begin to catch yourself and you can start to eliminate them from your speech.

Self Confidence

Have you ever played a gig and wondered if it’s grooving?  Maybe you think it’s a bit too slow, or perhaps you feel like your bass drum is lagging, or your snare is rushing.  Or perhaps your hihat seems to be wavering in volume.  Once you start thinking about it you start getting in the way of actually doing it well.

I’ve been re-reading “The Inner Game of Tennis” by Timothy Gallwey.  It’s a great book about achieving peak performance and improving learning.  You can apply it to any skill and in fact there are many “Inner Game” books which have been co-written with other authors to cover other topics.  I’ve read “The Inner Game of Music” but I got more out of the tennis book and “The Inner Game of Skiing” (which I re-read every time I go skiing). When reading these books I always find many concepts that I can easily apply to drumming.

An underlying concept of the books is that if you feel like you do something badly and criticise yourself (“that fill sucked – you were rushing and came in way too early”) then you’re kind of having a conversation with yourself.  In this scenario, who, exactly, is criticising whom?  After all, there’s only one of you.

In order to play the drums well your body has to learn what to do.  It’s like learning to drive.  When you start out you have to think about every single thing and it takes an enormous amount of concentration.  When you’ve been driving for a while it becomes almost automatic and your conscious mind takes the roll of deciding where to go.  You no longer have to think about the biting point of the clutch, or when exactly you have to signal.  In fact, if you do start paying too much attention to those things then you might miss your turn.  You’ve learned to trust what Gallwey calls ‘self 2′ to do its thing, and you just decide where you want to go.

I realised that when I’m playing a gig and I start questioning the position of my bass drum, or whether I’m speeding up or slowing down, then I’m essentially getting in the way of self 2 doing what it does best.  However, it always felt like a cop out to say that I play better when I’m not thinking about it.  Maybe I feel “in the moment” and I could assume that it’s better that way, but I fear that if I’m not analysing what I’m playing then how do I know that it’s any good?  The ideal situation would be to know that I could let go and enjoy playing without analysing it and the result would be good.

When I’m recording gigs, I can allow myself to be in the moment and not let my conscious mind get too involved in analysing and pulling apart my playing as it’s happening.  Then, after the gig I can listen back and see how that sounded.  In this way I’m learning that I can trust “self 2″ to do a pretty decent job.

Listening back I might realise that I have a tendency to speed up a little when I go to the bell of the ride in a certain song.  The next time I’m playing that song I might consciously decide to hold back a little, but I’ll avoid trying to analyse the situation there and then.  I’ll just pay attention to how it feels.  Maybe I feel like the song is a little slow and I’ll remember that for when I’m listening back but I’ll just go with it.  If, when I listen back, it sounds very groovy, then I know for future reference that even though it feels slow, it can sound groovy.

The result is that, over time, I learn to trust myself to play well without analysing what I’m doing.  That allows my conscious mind to think about where I want to go and I can let “self 2″ do the driving.

 

That’s all for now.  I have another 20 or so gigs to figure out some more things.  Check out the Tour Dates and come and say hello if we’re playing near you…

Snare Sound

snare sound

The above is a recording from my iPhone of how the top head of my snare drum is tuned.

It’s a 6.5 x 14 Ian Paice signature model.

I’ve been recording gigs on the tour and I was unhappy with the tuning of my snare.  It was too loud and pokey, and I decided it was tuned too high.  I dropped the tuning a bit and now I’m happy with it.  I recorded the audio file for future reference when re-heading.

Thoughts on Foot Technique

One thing about touring is it gives me the opportunity to try out different techniques night after night and see how they affect the sound, accuracy, and ease of playing.  So far on this tour I’ve been focussing mainly on my bass drum technique.  Specifically, I’ve been directing my attention to the point of contact between my foot and the pedal.

I’ve played heel up pretty much since I saw Dave Weckl’s “Back to Basics” video when I was 13.  When he talks about foot technique he says that he plays with the ball of his foot, rather than his toes.  I thought I’d been following his advice to the letter until recently when I took a running lesson from a boxing coach.  He was talking about the ‘ball’ of the foot and how it has more nerve endings than the other parts of the foot.  Boxers like to put their weight mainly on this part of the foot when they’re moving around as it gives them better feedback about balance, etc.  He then showed me what the ball of the foot was and pointed to the bit of the foot that looks like a ball – where the big toe joins the foot.  This was a revelation to me, as for some strange reason I’d thought for the last 17 years that it’s the area where all the toes meet the foot – more like a row of balls.  And, this “row of balls” is what I’ve been attacking the pedal board with for just as many years.  I wondered where I’d got that idea, and suspected that when Dave says he plays with the ball of his foot that maybe he also points to this area.  I’d have to dig out the video to check.

As soon as I got back behind a kit I started playing around with this idea and focusing on the point of contact being the base of my big toe (definition 1 in diagram).  Immediately I noticed a few differences.  It was easier to focus on this smaller part and check that it was the actual point of contact.  When you’re focusing on the whole width of the foot as a potential point of contact there are more possibilities.  I noticed sometimes that the point of contact would end up more towards the outside of my foot – closer to the little toe.  This usually happened more when I needed to play a quick succession of notes.
On closer examination I realised the reason for this was that in order to play these notes my leg would tense a bit and I’d lift it higher and try and play the notes as my heel descended.  If you try this you’ll find that it’s nearly impossible to retain the point of contact as the ball of the foot (under the big toe) if your heel is too high.  In order to do that you’d need to flex your toes back a long way.  Perhaps female (or transvestite) drummers, used to wearing high heels, could manage this, but for me it’s definitely a strain.
It seemed that the result of lifting my heel and trying to play with the ball of my foot meant the the point of contact moved closer to my little toe so that I could get the big toe out of the way.  Those toes get in the way less so I didn’t feel like I was playing with my toes, even though they were tensing up.
As a result of trying to play specifically with the ball under my big toe I’ve modified my technique to lift my heel less in preparation for multiple strokes.  Instead, I’m pulling my foot back (as if I were playing heel down) while keeping my heel off the ground but only by an inch or so.  I’ve found that this makes the multiple strokes more even and less ‘panicky’.  So far, so good.
When I came to start writing this article I was searching google for a picture to indicate where the ball of the foot is.  In searching I discovered that most sources agree with my initial belief that the ball is where all of the toes join the foot (definition 1).
What did I learn from this experience?  Well, the first thing is that it’s very easy to think you’ve understood something, when in fact you’ve missed an important part.  Whenever technical talk is involved, unless you clarify the terms, it’s easy for one party to be talking about one thing while the other party is imagining something completely different.  It can happen even with non-technical conversation.  Imagine you go to someone’s house and they ask you if you like spaghetti.  In order for you to answer that question you imagine a large bowl of steaming spaghetti bolognese with parmesan grated on the top.  ”Yes, I love it” you say.  They go to the kitchen and come out chewing on a dried stick of spaghetti and offer you one.  See what I mean?
Anyway, the disagreement on what the ‘ball of the foot’ is led me to re-evaluate my technique and direct some focus to an area that I hadn’t thought about in a long time.  My conclusion, for now, is that it’s better to keep the heel lower and not tense the toes.  I focus on the point of contact being the area around the base of my big toe and second toe.  Even though the outside part might technically fit into some descriptions of “ball of the foot” I feel that the outside of the foot is less stable, and requires more tension in my foot in order to get power that way.  Play around with it for yourself and see how you get on.
I’ve also recently made a couple of other changes to my bass drum technique.  I now tend to come even further down the footboard than I used to, so there’s more leverage and less pedal to move.  I’d say the ‘ball’ of my foot is somewhere slightly below the middle of the foot board, but it changes throughout the gig and I’m still experimenting.
I also prepare as late as possible.  I want the beater to come back as far as it can, but I don’t want my leg to be hovering in the air at all.  It’s like a whip and I’m waiting until the last minute to play the stroke.  I want each stroke to feel solid and powerful and confidently placed.  It takes time to get comfortable with it.
Finally, I think of loosening my ankle joint.  I noticed that when I was playing shuffle grooves with my right foot my ankle would start to tense up.  It seemed to help to think of that joint being more flexible and floppy.  I can’t explain it much better than that.  Just paying attention to it seems to help.
Feel free to leave your thoughts and comments below…